Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrar
1.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 68(3): 282-288, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38437182

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Varicocoele is commonly encountered in males with infertility. Studies have shown that varicocoele repair (surgery or embolisation) can improve the rate of subsequent pregnancy. In Australia, there have been no studies assessing the cost of varicocoele embolisation and current practice is based on international data. This study aimed to assess the cost of varicocoele embolisation and estimate the treatment cost per pregnancy. METHODS: Retrospective cost-outcome study of patients treated by embolisation between January 2018 and 2023. A bottom-up approach was used to calculate procedure costs whereas a top-down approach was used to calculate costs for all other patient services, including direct and indirect costs. To calculate cost per pregnancy, costs were adjusted according to existing published data on the rate of pregnancy after embolisation. RESULTS: Costing data from 18 patients were included, of median age 33.5 years (range 26-60) and median varicocoele grade 2.5 (range 1-3). All patients had unilateral treatment, most commonly via right internal jugular (16 patients, 89%) and using a 0.035″ system (17 patients, 94%). The median cost for the entire treatment including procedural, non-procedural, ward and peri-procedural costs was AUD$2208.10 (USD$1405 or EUR€1314), range AUD$1691-7051. The projected cost to the healthcare system per pregnancy was AUD$5387 (USD$3429 or EUR€3207). CONCLUSION: Total varicocoele embolisation cost and the cost per-pregnancy were lower than for both embolisation and surgical repair in existing international studies. Patients undergoing varicocoele treatment should have the option to access an interventional radiologist to realise the benefits of this low-cost pinhole procedure.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Varicocele , Humanos , Feminino , Adulto , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Embolização Terapêutica/economia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Austrália , Varicocele/terapia , Varicocele/economia , Varicocele/diagnóstico por imagem , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Análise Custo-Benefício
3.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 33(5): 505-509, 2022 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35489783

RESUMO

Splenic artery embolization (SAE) plays a critical role in the treatment of high-grade splenic injury not requiring emergent laparotomy. SAE preserves splenic tissue, and growing evidence demonstrates preserved short-term splenic immune function after SAE. However, long-term function is less studied. Patients who underwent SAE for blunt abdominal trauma over a 10-year period were contacted for long-term follow-up. Sixteen participants (sex: women, 10, and men, 6; age: median, 34 years, and range, 18-67 years) were followed up at a median of 7.7 years (range, 4.7-12.8 years) after embolization. Splenic lacerations were of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma grades III to V, and 14 procedures involved proximal embolization. All individuals had measurable levels of IgM memory B cells (median, 14.30 as %B cells), splenic tissue present on ultrasound (median, 122 mL), and no history of severe infection since SAE. In conclusion, this study quantitatively demonstrated that long-term immune function remains after SAE for blunt abdominal trauma based on the IgM memory B cell levels.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Abdominais , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Traumatismos Abdominais/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Imunidade , Imunoglobulina M , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Baço/irrigação sanguínea , Baço/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Esplênica/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 65(7): 883-887, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34729931

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) is rare; however, it has been observed in patients with vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopaenia syndrome (VITT) following the use of adenovirus vector vaccines against COVID-19. Adverse vaccine effects have been heavily addressed in mainstream media, likely contributing to vaccination anxiety. This study aimed to assess how the vaccine rollout and media coverage has influenced the use of computed tomography venography (CTV) in an acute care setting of a tertiary hospital. METHOD: Single-centre retrospective cohort study from 30 March 2021 to 13 June 2021. Direct comparison to same calendar dates in the preceding 3 years. RESULTS: In 2021, 57 patients received CTV with headache being the reason in 48 (84%) and 40 (70%) had received ChAdOx1 nCov-19 (AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccination). Only 20 of these patients received CTV after platelets and D-Dimer had returned, and only three patients met existing guidelines for imaging. Zero cases were positive. The number of CTV studies was 5.2 times than in 2020 and 2.7 times the mean number for the 3 preceding years. CONCLUSION: The use of CTV in patients with headache has markedly increased at our centre since negatively biased vaccination influence of mainstream media. Headache is a common vaccine-related side effect and VITT is exceptionably rare. With the rates of vaccination increasing in the community, these results highlight the importance of strict adherence to established evidence-based guidelines. Otherwise, critical care capacity, and in particular imaging resources already under pressure will be strained further.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Trombose dos Seios Intracranianos , Vacinas contra COVID-19 , ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , Angiografia por Tomografia Computadorizada , Humanos , Flebografia , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Vacinação
6.
Injury ; 52(2): 243-247, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32962832

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Splenic artery embolisation (SAE) has been shown to be an effective treatment for haemodynamically stable patients with high-grade blunt splenic injury. However, there are no local estimates of how much treatment costs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost of providing SAE to patients in the setting of blunt abdominal trauma at an Australian level 1 trauma centre. METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective review of 10 patients who underwent splenic embolisation from December 2017 to December 2018 for the treatment of isolated blunt splenic injury, including cost of procedure and the entire admission. Costs included angiography costs including equipment, machine, staff, and post-procedural costs including pharmacy, general ward costs, orderlies, ward nursing, allied health, and further imaging. RESULTS: During the study period, patients remained an inpatient for a mean of 4.8 days and the rate of splenic salvage was 100%. The mean total cost of splenic embolisation at our centre was AUD$10,523 and median cost AUD$9959.6 (range of $4826-$16,836). The use of a plug as embolic material was associated with increased cost than for coils. Overall cost of patients requiring ICU was mean AUD$11,894 and median AUD$11,435.8. Overall cost for those not requiring ICU was mean AUD$7325 and median AUD$8309.8. CONCLUSION: Splenic embolisation is a low-cost procedure for management of blunt splenic injury. The cost to provide SAE at our centre was much lower than previously modelled data from overseas studies. From a cost perspective, the use of ICU for monitoring after the procedure significantly increased cost and necessity may be considered on a case-by-case basis. Further research is advised to directly compare the cost of SAE and splenectomy in an Australian setting.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica , Ferimentos não Penetrantes , Austrália , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Estudos Retrospectivos , Esplenectomia , Artéria Esplênica/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Esplênica/lesões , Centros de Traumatologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagem , Ferimentos não Penetrantes/terapia
7.
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol ; 64(1): 18-22, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31793208

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Uterine fibroids have the potential to cause morbidity, and there is a substantial cost to both the healthcare system and society. There is support for minimally invasive intervention, and uterine fibroid embolisation (UFE) is an established cost-effective option for women wishing for an alternative to surgery. There is a lack of local Australian costing data to compliment use in the public hospital system, and we offer a costing analysis of running a public hospital service. METHODS: We reviewed the costs for 10 sequential uterine fibroid embolisation cases, by assessing the direct and indirect hospital costs. RESULTS: The total cost of providing a uterine fibroid embolisation service using our model in a public hospital including initial outpatient assessment, procedure costs, overnight hospital ward stay and outpatient follow-up is $3995 per admission. CONCLUSION: Using our model, the overall cost to perform this procedure is low, and lower than prior estimates for surgical alternatives. We encourage government and regulatory bodies to support UFE through guidelines and remuneration models, and encourage more public Australian interventional radiology departments to offer this service.


Assuntos
Embolização Terapêutica/economia , Embolização Terapêutica/métodos , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Leiomioma/terapia , Neoplasias Uterinas/terapia , Austrália , Feminino , Hospitais Públicos/economia , Humanos , Leiomioma/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas/economia , Útero
8.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 43(2): 238-245, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31720807

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Currently, data surrounding predicting difficulty of IVC filter retrievals are heterogenous and conflicting. We aimed to identify which of many variables associated with IVC filters is a risk for procedural difficulty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively reviewed 6 years of IVC filter retrievals at a tertiary center identifying 356 consecutive retrievals. A difficult retrieval was defined as any case where the fluoroscopy time exceeded 7 min, an advanced technique was required, the retrieval attempt failed and required an additional attempt or was left permanent, or there was major complication such as IVC filter fracture/migration/vessel injury. RESULTS: There were 105 filter retrievals defined as difficult (29.5%). Univariate analysis showed significantly increased risk for retrievals with an embedded top. Multivariate analysis assessed the association between dwell time, tilt, age, non-hooked filters, leg penetration and difficult retrieval. This showed a significant increase in the difficulty of retrieval for filters tilted between 5° and 15° (odds ratio 2.38, p < 0.001), for filters tilted more than 15° (odds ratio 7.91, p < 0.001), and dwell time greater than 6 months (odds ratio 2.06, p = 0.033). No significant increase in difficulty was seen with filters with a dwell time of less than 6 months, leg penetration, non-hooked filters, or with increasing patient age. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying these risks in patients in advance of the procedure allows appropriate planning and improved workflow efficiency.


Assuntos
Remoção de Dispositivo/métodos , Radiografia Intervencionista/métodos , Filtros de Veia Cava , Veia Cava Inferior/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Fluoroscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA